|
| INFOWARS.net Copyright © 2001-2005 Alex Jones All rights reserved. |
 |
|
|
UPDATE: Scotland Yard "Not Interested" in 7/7 Mastermind Aswat.
"Incompetence theorists" still deny inside involvement
Steve Watson/Infowars | August 10 2005
On August 2nd we reported the revelation that the "mastermind" of the 7/7 London Bombings, Haroon Rashid Aswat, is a British Intelligence Asset.
Former Justice Dept. Prosecutor and Terror expert
John
Loftus revealed that British Intelligence and the US dept of Justice
had protected Haroon Rashid Aswat: "Back in 1999 he came to America.
The Justice Department wanted to indict him in Seattle because him and his
buddy were trying to set
up a terrorist training school in Oregon... we've just learned that
the headquarters of the US Justice Department ordered the Seattle prosecutors
not to touch Aswat... , apparently Aswat was working for British intelligence"
On 29th July the London Times reported that Aswat had been arrested in Zambia in "Britain's biggest manhunt". Aswat had been named as a "key Al Qaeda figure" in FBI documents and According to several newspaper and wire reports, Aswat spoke with some of the four July 7 attackers.
Aswat had apparently been
"on the run" since 1999 yet he was allowed to live and work in
London and come and go from Britain as he pleased. Days after the bombings
he was said to be in Pakistani custody, yet he somehow managed to slip away
from the authorities there as well and ended up in Africa.
British anti-terror investigators have since downplayed the theory of Aswat as the mastermind behind 7/7, yet it has now been reported that Aswat has been brought back into Britain yet Scotland Yard are "not interested" in talking to him. Instead Scotland Yard seem to be more concerned with charging the dummy bombers of 21/7 who killed no-one and whose bombs consisted of flour. NO ONE HAS BEEN CHARGED WITH OR QUESTIONED ABOUT THE REAL BOMBINGS THAT KILLED OVER 50 PEOPLE. WHY?
The indication seems to be because it was an inside Intelligence operation. We have exhaustively documented the clear evidence that the mainstream media will not cover. It's the same operation everytime. The real terrorists are allowed to go free, because they are working within intelligence service guidelines, whilst a group of patsies or failed copycats are grabbed and publicly blamed.
Aswat has been named as a "Key Al Qaeda figure", even if he was not involved in the bombings you would expect our security services to want to question him extensively in an attempt to extract any knowledge he may have. You would also expect our mainstream media to be up in arms over this issue, yet they do not question a single thing.
The dying phenomenon of the "Incompetence theorists"
Ask yourself two questions, firstly Incompetence or
Conspiracy? Is it more likely that British security services, police force
and media act with such incompetence at all levels, top to bottom, consistently
again and again and again, or is it more likely that at the very top a small
corrupt cabal is purposefully letting these "mistakes" happen
because it is part of a pre-planned agenda?
Secondly who benefits? Do the Islamic fundamentalists, who become demonized throughout the entire Muslim and Western world, whose outlets to preach their ideologies become severely restricted, and whose very survival becomes under threat. Or do the authorities who get greater funding, increased powers, extended freedom to operate and carte blanche privileges that take precedent over any public civil liberties that may have previously infringed their activities?
If, as we are told over and over, the terrorists hate us because they hate our freedom then why are the authorities, who are supposedly fighting terror, restricting our freedom?
There has been a distinct shift in public perspective
in Britain, akin to that in the US in the years after 911, whereby the public
no longer dismiss the difficult facts as "conspiracy theory",
they put them down to authoritarial incompetence. These "incompetence
theorists" will still not leave their comfort zone mind set because
it means they would have to stand up and get involved which they would rather
not have to do. Yet this IS an encouraging development because it shows
that as we document the inconsistencies and the facts that the mainstream
media will not report, we are having an impact and we are altering public
perception. Soon enough the "incompetence theorists" will languish
in numbers alongside the "coincidence theorists" and our integrity
will be further bolstered.
