|
14 Structural Engineers Now
Publicly Challenge Government's Explanation for Destruction of
the World Trade Center
George
Washington's Blog
Thursday, April 10, 2008
14 structural engineers now publicly challenge the government's
account of the destruction of the Trade Centers on 9/11:
A prominent engineer
with 55 years experience, in charge of the design of hundreds of
major building projects including high rise offices, former member
of the California Seismic Safety Commission and former member of
the National Institute of Sciences Building Safety Council (Marx
Ayres) believes that the World Trade Centers were brought down by
controlled demolition (see also this)
Two professors of structural engineering at a prestigious Swiss
university (Dr. Joerg Schneider and Dr. Hugo Bachmann) said that,
on
9/11, World Trade Center 7 was brought down by controlled demolition
(translation here)
(Article continues below)
Kamal
S. Obeid, structural engineer, with a masters degree in Engineering
from UC Berkeley, of Fremont, California, says:
"Photos of the steel, evidence about how the buildings
collapsed, the unexplainable collapse of WTC 7, evidence of thermite
in the debris as well as several other red flags, are quite troubling
indications of well planned and controlled demolition"
Ronald H. Brookman, structural engineer, with a masters degree in
Engineering from UC Davis, of Novato California, writes:
"Why would all 110 stories drop straight down to the
ground in about 10 seconds, pulverizing the contents into dust
and ash - twice. Why would all 47 stories of WTC 7 fall straight
down to the ground in about seven seconds the same day? It was
not struck by any aircraft or engulfed in any fire. An independent
investigation is justified for all three collapses including the
surviving steel samples and the composition of the dust."
Graham John Inman, structural engineer, of London, England, points
out:
"WTC 7 Building could not have collapsed
as a result of internal fire and external debris. NO plane hit
this building. This is the only case of a steel frame building
collapsing through fire in the world. The fire on this building
was small & localized therefore what is the cause?"
Paul W. Mason, structural engineer, of Melbourne, Australia, argues:
"In my view, the chances of the three buildings collapsing
symmetrically into their own footprint, at freefall speed, by
any other means than by controlled demolition, are so remote that
there is no other plausible explanation!"
Mills M. Kay Mackey, structural engineer, of Denver, Colorado, points
out:
"The force from the jets and the burning
fuel could not have been sufficient to make the building collapse.
Why doesn't the media mention that the 11th floor was completely
immolated on February 13th, 1975? It had the weight of nearly
100 stories on top of it but it did not collapse?"
Haluk Akol, Structural
Engineer and architect (ret.)
Charles
Pegelow, structural engineer, of Houston, Texas (and see this)
Dennis Kollar, structural
engineer, of West Bend, Wisconsin
Doyle
Winterton, structural engineer (retired)
Michael
T. Donly, P.E., structural engineer
William
Rice, P.E., structural engineer, former professor of Vermont
Technical College
There are many other structural
engineers who have questioned the government's account in private.
We support them and wish them courage to discuss these vital issues
publicly.
See also this.
|
INFOWARS:
BECAUSE THERE'S A WAR ON FOR YOUR MIND
|
|
