|
Who Cares About Your DNA?
Tricia Shore
Lew Rockwell.com
Thursday, April 24, 2008
When the elite want something, they are not above cheating
their way to it. We see this example easily with mainstream
media’s blackout of Ron Paul and Mike Gravel as presidential
candidates, despite the candidates’ novel ideas. Candidates
not elite-anointed are dismissed as crackpots and ignored
by the Los Angeles Times and other mainstream propaganda outlets
because they do not further the elite’s plans, which
include tracking and surveillance that closely emulate plans
laid out by Aldous Huxley and George Orwell.
One sneaky way that the elite obtain their goals is to use
a voice vote, which is what recently happened with H.R. 3825,
a giant step toward the Brave New World that Huxley described.
H.R. 3825 and S. 1858, soon to be rubber-stamped by King Jorge
unless there is a massive protest along with a miracle, gives
the federal government authority over every newborn’s
DNA, without parental consent. Not only the average Oprah
and Dr. Phil watcher, but many alert citizens are also unaware
of this horrid legislation, which will make any newborn’s
DNA government property. This massive intrusion into privacy
and family will be funded by yet another massive federally-funded
program, paid for by the money that the government forces
from you.
I find it especially interesting, when considered along with
this recent Orwellianly-named "Newborn Screening Saves
Lives Act" that in the government’s latest attempt
to separate families en masse, government social wreckers
are forcing over 400 children to have their DNA tested:
More than 400 children taken from a polygamous sect's ranch
will undergo DNA testing this week, an attempt to determine
who their parents are and if any sexual abuse took place.
Officials plan to begin taking DNA samples
Monday at the coliseum in San Angelo where the children are
being housed, but may need three or four days to complete
the job.
(Article continues below)
The fact that this horrid invasion of privacy is being done,
even to children who are still breastfeeding, without parental
consent and without an established accuser or proof of any
abuse, tells me that there are far too many people hooked
on mainstream media. Otherwise, there would be blood in the
Texas streets. Just 100 years ago, an alert citizenry would
have protested the taking of these children and their DNA
by showing some social wreckers what the end of a gun barrel
looks like.
In post-Constitutional America, however, where habeas corpus,
that long-standing idea that we’ve had around for a
few centuries, has gone the way of the dinosaur, people are
okay with taking children from mothers and forcing these children,
many of whom are not even old enough to say no, to give the
government their DNA.
"A Critical Analysis of the Implications for Genetic
Privacy and Consent Rights in Congress’ Proposed ‘Newborn
Screening Saves Lives Act of 2007’" states how
the government plans to treat the DNA of every newborn, even
those whose parents are completely aligned with the mainstream:
-
Establish a national list of genetic conditions
for which newborns and children are to be tested.
-
Establish protocols for the linking and
sharing of genetic test results nationwide.
-
Build surveillance systems for tracking
the health status and health outcomes of individuals diagnosed
at birth with a genetic defect or trait.
-
Use the newborn screening program as an
opportunity for government agencies to identify, list, and
study "secondary conditions" of individuals and
their families.
-
Subject citizens to genetic research without
their knowledge or consent.
Since my firstborn’s birth over seven years ago, I
have read a lot about our government’s roots of freedom
and a truly free market and I have acquired great disdain
for our current government and mainstream media; I wish that
were not the case. However, a country focused on the false
choices of Hillary, Obama, and John, as if there’s a
dash of difference among the three, does not protest a bill
that claims to save lives of newborns. Nor do these people
care much about taking DNA from innocent children who’ve
been separated from their parents, with no accuser identified
and no solid evidence of abuse. I realize that I’ve
mentioned the last part of that sentence previously, but it’s
important enough to state twice: The Constitution states that
we have the right to face our accuser, an impossible thing
to do when there is not one.
That’s the way that things work, however, in post-Constitutional
America, where a King that seems to be elected by the people
rules through Executive Orders and the elite have their way,
whether rushing legislation through, as with the Patriot Act,
or taking an underhanded voice vote, in which legislators
are not forced to take responsibility for their vote.
Photo Credit: Mr. Comic Mom
Unfortunately, most people are too concerned with the junk
food that mainstream media are feeding us to worry much about
the database that the government is building, using their
descendants’ blood. The United States’ forefathers
expected us to be an intelligent, literate folk. But the literacy
rate was much higher two hundred years ago than it is now,
proving what a wonderful job that the government schools have
done. People don’t much read anymore and they certainly
don’t care. In the near future, the elite will pass
legislation that requires microchipping of every newborn and
Oprah will say how wonderful it is and there will be some
kind of "saving lives" rhetoric added to the bill
and people will think that microchipping is fabulous.
Despite the massive power that the elite pretend to have,
in reality, we have only ourselves to blame.
|
INFOWARS:
BECAUSE THERE'S A WAR ON FOR YOUR MIND
|
|