The US army is circumventing laws that shield women from combat dangers.

The reason isn't just a shortage of male recruits. It is part of a larger psychological strategy to render us dysfunctional and docile by undermining heterosexuality and the nuclear family by denying/erasing male-female differences.

We are victims of Orwellian social engineering so successful that we don't even realize it happened.

We are in the final stages of a conspiracy to hijack the human race. All of our institutions have been subverted by a satanic cult, originating in a heretical Jewish sect (Sabbateans),
spread by a vast occult network (Freemasons) and empowered by the central banking cartel, which seeks totalitarian power. 

They are "satanic" in the sense they have deliberately displaced God. They defy universal natural and moral laws and use the media and education (propaganda) to define their evil as good.

A hydra-headed monster, they take the form of dupes and opportunists of all stripes, including liberals, socialists, neo Cons, feminists, Communists, gay activists and Zionists.

Our institutions (media, government, religion, military, justice, education) are not free and democratic,and no longer function in the public interest. They have succumbed to "world government" dupes and traitors. This is symbolized by the complicity of the US governing class in the slaughter and cover up of Sept. 11, 2001 and the hoax that is the "war on terror".

THE MILITARY

Conservative activist Elaine Donnelly  has been fighting "the military's "New Gender Order" for 25 years. She contends the military is "implementing illicit plans to force female soldiers into land combat units for the first time in our history" by pretending the women only have "support" roles.

Other reports  suggest that in Iraq, males and females are interchangeable in combat roles.
Donnelly believes this trend weakens fighting ability and harms unit cohesion by creating romantic liaisons. She also believes women are at a physical disadvantage and should not be placed in harm's way.

“Modern body armor alone weighs 25 pounds. This weight is proportionately more difficult to carry by female soldiers who are, on average, shorter and smaller than men, with 45-50% less upper body strength and 25-30% less aerobic capacity, which is essential for endurance. Even in current non-combat training, women suffer debilitating bone stress fractures and other injuries at rates double those of men.”

“Deliberate exposure of women to combat violence is tantamount to acceptance of violence against women in general,” she says. 

On her website, Donnelly has a list of 81 women killed in the war on terror.

"In the New Gender Order we are not supposed to care about female soldiers any more than we do about males soldiers," she writes. But she maintains that male protection of female and children is an essential civilizing impulse.

She quotes a West Point graduate: "Ninety years ago the Titanic men gave their lives for the women and children 'because it was the civilized thing to do,' now women are masculinized to serve in wars for American males [who are] relaxing at golf and tennis clubs and declaring it 'progress." ("Constructing the Co-Ed Military")


PERSONAL TESTIMONY

"Jessica Phoenix" is the pen name of an Iraq veteran who alerted me to this story. She writes:

"Although my fitness scores were outstanding for a 33 year old female, I was far below the male standards. Women aren't supposed to meet male standards.

I joined the Army out of financial desperation, not because I wanted to invade men's work places. I was told I would get placed in an office. I never saw an office.

It was bad enough that I had to invade Iraq for a year exactly the way the men did. But then I got put in the field artillery in Korea.

The sergeants there tried to punish me whenever I failed to keep up with the boys, but it was useless. I just ended up getting treated like a criminal every day. They thought they could punish the woman out of me. They thought they could turn me into a man with enough threats and punishment. It didn't work. I'm still a woman.

I could not cock the cannon weapon because the cock lever was too heavy. A man injured my arm practicing his combat moves on me. I got a neck injury because the gear was too heavy for my back.

And of course, they all wanted sex, but I'm not that kind of girl. I was offered a promotion for sex.

The artillery does a lot of heavy lifting. But I couldn't lift and load with them. I begged them to give me a job that did not involve heavy lifting, but they wanted me to stand there and look bad. So my job skills were going to waste. What were they paying me for? I couldn't help the boys with their work. I couldn't keep up with them during training. And I wouldn't have sex with them either. I just want to know why I was there to begin with.

Then after eight months of this torture they gave me an award for outstanding achievement and offered me $40,000 to re-enlist. I wouldn't re-enlist if they paid me a million dollars. [In fact, Jessica had to hire a lawyer just to get out of the army. ]I want to bring back the
Women's Corp (nurses, administration) separate from the men's army."

Jessica would have re-enlisted if the army recognized the differences between men and women. This may also apply to men who don't re-enlist.

MORE PERSONAL TESTIMONY

A reader, Paul, sends examples of how our "leaders" think they can redefine nature:

"I served in the US Army as an Officer from 1987 to 1995. I can attest to the ludicrousness of women in combat roles. I served in both coed and all male units. The PC factor was relentless and stopped at nothing to silent common sense critics.

Yet, on the simplest of patrol training missions, I watched women break ankles in what for the rest of us men was a stroll. I saw women given favorable treatment to get through airborne school, while the rest of us men were abused and physically tortured to earn those wings.

When my airborne school stick jumped from our first airplane we were about 40 percent female. By our 4th jump, all the women had suffered broken bones and were gone. I can go on with many many more examples.

All-male units never had the level of politics and cliques that happened in coed units. If anyone pointed these realities out to a superior officer, he was swiftly reprimanded. Say it loud enough and your career as an Officer was over. I can't imagine the US Army ever winning a war against a determined, well-equipped and organized adversary, if we
continue maintaining this PC lie.

I think even General MacArthur would have seen defeat with this type of mentality in Korea. Reality does not lie, and some day not too far away our cowardly PC leaders will pay a fearsome price for their insolence."

CONCLUSION

Under the guise of women's or homosexual rights the Satanist elite is engaged in a hateful psychological attack on heterosexuals.

Protecting women and children is a natural instinct and motivation for men. Accepting that protection defines women as feminine. Elite-satanists want to destroy these sources of identity, motivation, and social cohesion. They want to destroy civilization in the name of "revolution" which really is central banker tyranny. Communism was a dry run for this tyranny; feminism grew out of Communism. 

The unisex subversion is not exclusive to the army. The insistence that women serve in jobs that involve danger and physical duress is an assault on our heterosexual nature. I am referring to firemen, policemen, landscapers, and construction workers. We are being neutered!

Placing women in these jobs also denies the natural role of men as providers and women as wives, homemakers and mothers. These roles have provided our identity, meaning and happiness for centuries.

I have often said all wars are against humanity. This is a perfect example. We are the real enemy. Women in combat undermine military effectiveness and heterosexual identity. I have not even touched on the rampant sexual exploitation of women soldiers. 

Feminists masquerade as defenders of women yet these bureaucrats and politicians clamor for women's "opportunities" in combat. All the Democratic candidates say women will be part of any future draft.

Since when is it wrong to batter a women at home yet OK if she is killed, maimed or raped by an enemy? This exposes the feminist movement for what it is: an enemy of women, and shill of the central banker conspiracy.

What the elite calls "progress" and "modern" I'm afraid is really the overthrow of God and nature. Society has been headed in the wrong direction for some time. Increasingly people are awakening to this harsh reality.