|
Hillary’s “New
War”
Kurt
Nimmo
Friday Aug 24, 2007
Come November, 2008, Democrats will, not unlike pre-programmed
Stepford wives, line up behind Hillary Clinton. Democrats have
no other choice, as most of them are disgusted with two terms
of Bush, that is to say the neocons. Of course, Hillary is not
much different, maybe in minor style but hardly in substance,
and a vote for Hillary—call it the Clinton dynasty, following
on the heels of the Bush dynasty—will be a vote for more
mass murder and incalculable misery. Democrats will naturally
minimize this, as they will be in great numbers superficially
satisfied with Clinton over Bush, never mind there is but a speck
of difference between the two. Few Democrats complained when Bill
Clinton bombed Serbia with depleted uranium because this crime
was sold as a “humanitarian effort,” as the invasion
of Iraq was sold as the liberation of the Iraqi people, most who
now pine for the good old days of Saddam Hussein.
As John
Fout notes, the American people are easily hornswoggled, although
Mr. Fout did not put it that way, not precisely. As Fout points
out, back in 2003, “the average American supported action
in Iraq…. Bush’s approval ratings were above 80%,
and few questioned his choices. Clinton’s vote was in lockstep
with how people felt. Her change of heart on Iraq since has tracked
consistently with the opinion of the general public.” However,
Clinton’s “change of heart” is simply a stratagem
for pushing toward next November, as she believes in war—or
invasion and occupation of an enfeebled nation decimated under
more than a decade of medieval sanctions—as the video posted
below indicates. On the day Clinton assumes the mantle, if she
decides–or more accurately, her neoliberal globalist controllers—to
bomb Iran, the American people will support her and Democrats
will move en masse to the streets to wave plastic American flags
made by Chinese slaves, never mind the formaldehyde. Of course,
there will need be a good reason, or rather a reason contrived,
as the neocons contrived several prior to the invasion of Iraq,
threadbare transparency not withstanding or remaining in memory
longer than a fortnight.
(Article continues below)
Finally, it is entirely laughable to hear the CFRite, John Edwards,
bash Clinton for her allegiance to “establishment elites,”
the very same ruling elite behind Edwards, not that most Americans
approach understanding the significance of Edwards statement,
never mind his one hundred and fifty watt glaring hypocrisy. “Edwards
said voters shouldn’t replace ‘a group of corporate
Republicans with a group of corporate Democrats.’ Seeming
to take a page out of Republican talking points from the ’90s,
he added, ‘The American people deserve to know that their
presidency is not for sale, the Lincoln Bedroom is not for rent,
and lobbyist money can no longer influence policy in the House
or the Senate,’” CNN
reports.
Of course, there is no difference between “corporate Republicans”
and “corporate Democrats,” it is all corporatism at
the end of the day and it was Benito Mussolini who said corporatism
is fascism, there is no difference, same as there is no difference
between Democrats and Republicans, that is beyond a few minor
social issues and color and pattern of a Pronto Uomo silk tie
and one made by Campia Moda.
Technorati Tags: Hillary
Clinton,
John Edwards,
Iraq War
|
INFOWARS:
BECAUSE THERE'S A WAR ON FOR YOUR MIND
|
|
