-----------------
Account Management
-----------------


 

Well, Mr. Pastor, What Exactly Would a North American Community Be?

DPA
Tuesday Aug 28, 2007

Robert Pastor, an author of "Building a North American Community," argues he never proposed a North American Union, merely a community — ok, let's look-up the definition of community.

Follow this link to the original source: "CNN's Malveaux said "conspiracy theorists" talk about North American Union -- what about Dobbs?"

COMMENTARY:

Robert Pastor, American University professor and Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) member, is commonly referred to as "the father of the North American Union" and as "an ardent supporter of this."  Pastor continuously replies that he never proposed a North American Union, merely a community. He claims that a union is "completely impractical and impossible."

Well, forgive me for sounding elementary, but isn't this just a play on words? A quick visit to "Webster's II New College Dictionary" published by Houghton Mifflin, defines a community as: "A group of people residing in the same locality and under the same government." (emphasis added)

Mr. Pastor, do you really expect us to believe you're not promoting a fully integrated North American Union?  You say you want the three nations to have common economic, trade, labor and security agreements, as well as a common security perimeter (open interior borders) to help facilitate trade. Yet you say the three countries can retain their own sovereignty. Exactly how will that work? By reading through your CFR publication "Building a North American Community" and by looking at the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) of North America goals, there doesn't appear to be a way to accomplish this without each country surrendering its sovereignty and the personal freedoms of its citizens.

(Article continues below)

I'm curious if the European Union's citizens were told the same line. After all they were told that at the very least they could vote on a new constitution. Oh wait, the EU abandoned that ploy after the EU Constitution was rejected by France and the Netherlands. It's now called the EU Treaty and only the governments need to ratify it, ignoring the will of the people. 

Of course the European Union used to be called the European Community. Does anyone see a pattern here? Incidentally, The New American magazine foretold the EU back in 1989 and also discussed it back in 2002.

Come on Mr. Pastor, stop the tap dancing and be honest with your fellow Americans. Fourth graders can look up words in the dictionary, but leave it to an academic heavyweight and political figurehead to play with semantics.

Email This Page to:
INFOWARS: BECAUSE THERE'S A WAR ON FOR YOUR MIND


INFOWARS.net          Copyright © 2001-2007 Alex Jones          All rights reserved.