Dear Deluded Mass Media, North American Union Agenda Exists
Despite official maps, documents, plans and bills in Congress
the reality of the NAU and trans border superhighway is
still denied as Ron Paul is attacked for speaking out
The media campaign to deny the reality of the move towards a North
American Union in the mold of the European Union, which would
encompass a merging of the economies of The US, Canada and Mexico,
continues with a sharp focus on attacking presidential candidate
Ron Paul who has spoken about the move on numerous occasions.
The North American Union issue came to the fore
last week when Congressman Ron Paul was sardonically asked during
the CNN GOP debate if he believed in it as his many supporters
Dr Paul put the record straight by explaining that
it is ludicrous to call the very real NAU movement a conspiracy
“The CFR exists, the Trilateral Commission
exists,” Paul explained. “And it is a ‘conspiracy
of ideas,’ this is an ideological battle. Some people believe
in globalism, others believe in national sovereignty. And there
is a move on toward a North American Union, just like early on
there was a move for a European Union that eventually ended up.
So we have NAFTA and a move toward a NAFTA highway, these are
Despite Ron Paul's explanation that these things
are real, and despite overwhelming and manifestly provable evidence
that they are real, the hacks at CNN spent much of their post
debate coverage attacking the Congressman on the issue as if he
The post debate coverage in the video below features
these attacks followed by a look at the various legislation, maps
and websites that document the reality of a move toward a North
American Union and a trans national corridor:
(Article continues below)
Ron Paul again had to explain on CNN yesterday that
plans for the NAU and an accompanying highway exist in reality
despite continued mind numbing denial:
The framework on which the American Union is being pegged is a
cross border North American Free Trade Agreement super highway
that stretches from southern Mexico through the US up to Montreal
The organisation overseeing the implementation of
the highway is NASCO,
the North America SuperCorridor Coalition Inc., which
describes itself as a “non-profit organization dedicated
to developing the world’s first international, integrated
and secure, multi-modal transportation system along the International
Mid-Continent Trade and Transportation Corridor to improve both
the trade competitiveness and quality of life in North America.”
NASCO has received $250 million in earmarks from
the U.S. Department of Transportation to plan the NAFTA Super
Highway as a 10-lane limited-access road (five lanes in each direction)
plus passenger and freight rail lines running alongside pipelines
laid for oil and natural gas. One glance at the map of the NAFTA
Super Highway as produced by NASCO makes clear that the design
is to connect Mexico, Canada, and the U.S. into one transportation
Toll roads are to be placed upon existing roads
in Security Prosperity Partnership agreements that bypasses Congress,
agreements between the bureaucracies of the US and Mexican governments,
to raise capital to build the Super highway that will go South
of Texas and into Mexico.
Security Prosperity Partnership documents reveal
that out of 85 interstate highways, 83 of them are slated to go
under this agreement and toll roads are going down on them already.
The money from this operation with further fund the dismantling
of US sovereignty by seizing the infrastructure at it's very heart
in a bloodless coup.
The NAFTA corridor movement also involves CANAMEX,
another trade organization that promotes a Western tri-lateral
route utilizing I-19, I-10, I-93 and I-15 in the states of Arizona,
Nevada, Utah, Idaho and Montana to link the three countries in
trade. See below (click to enlarge).
Another non-profit group, the North
American Forum on Integration (NAFI), identifies
four bands of NAFTA corridors (Pacific, West, East and Atlantic),
all relying primarily upon internationalizing north-south existing
interstate highways into NAFTA trade corridors. See below.
The NAFI website states the following:
"Following the implementation of NAFTA, coalitions of
interest have been formed in order to promote specific transport
channels, to develop the infrastructures of these channels and
to propose jurisdictional amendments to facilitate the crossing
of borders. These coalitions include businesses, government
agencies, civil organizations, metropolitan areas, rural communities
and also individuals, wishing to strengthen the commercial hubs
of their regions."
"The North American trade corridors are bi- or tri-national
channels for which various cross-border interests have grouped
together in order to develop or consolidate the infrastructures.
The North American corridors are considered multimodal in the
sense that they bring into play different modes of transport
"The infrastructures may include roads, highways, transit
routes, airports, pipelines, railways and train stations, river
canal systems and port facilities, telecommunications networks
At the end of January we reported
on the revelation that one of the foreign toll road
conglomerates, Macquarie, has agreed to buy dozens of newspapers
in Texas and Oklahoma that have up until now been harsh critics
of the Trans Texas Corridor superhighway. This indicates a clear
example of influence peddling pointing to racketeering, and a
desperate lunge to silence dissent against the sellout of American
infrastructure and the North American Union.
The mainstream media will keep telling you none of this is real,
that its on a par with invading space aliens and that if you believe
in any of it you are totally crazy.
The further incontrovertible evidence for a NAU
agenda is overflowing, you could write entire books on the issue.
The initial Security and Prosperity Partnership
agreement was signed by President Bush, Mexican President Vicente
Fox and then-Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin in Waco, Texas,
March 23, 2005. It established working groups, under the North
American Free Trade Agreement office.
The documents contain references to upwards of 13
working groups within an entire organized
infrastructure that has drawn from officials within
most areas of administrative government including U.S. departments
of State, Homeland Security, Commerce, Treasury, Agriculture,
Transportation, Energy, Health and Human Services, and the office
of the U.S. Trade Representative.
documents (PDF link) from last year's SPP meeting
in Banff which were obtained by Judicial Watch under the FOIA,
refer to an "evolution by stealth" agenda for the SPP,
explaining that the Congress and the American people would not
willingly go along with such a move.
"The most important feature of the SPP design is that
it is neither intended to produce a treaty nor an executive
agreement like the NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement)
that would require congressional ratification or the passage
of implementing legislation in the United States. The SPP was
designed to function within existing administrative authority
of the executive branch."
The paper also states "mobility across the border is central
to the idea of an integrated North American economic space."
The Hudson White Paper also reminds us that the 2005 Council
on Foreign Relations document called "Building
a North American Community" bragged that its
recommendations are "explicitly linked" to SPP. The
Council on Foreign Relations document called for establishing
a "common perimeter" around North America by 2010, the
development of a biometric North American border pass, and the
adoption of a North American tariff."
CFR documents have revealed that the group wants
to "establish private bodies that would meet regularly or
annually to buttress North American relationships, along the lines
of the Bilderberg conferences." (Bilderberg are the power
brokers behind the formation of the EU and the single European
During the recent secretive SPP meeting an advisory Council created
last year known as the North
American Competitiveness Council met on issues including
border regulation and competitiveness in the automotive, transportation,
manufacturing and services sectors. The council is expected to
meet annually with security and prosperity ministers and will
engage with senior government officials on an ongoing basis.
The most recent SPP meeting in Canada also saw the US army enforce
a huge 25km
security perimeter as well as cracking down on protests,
barring media and shutting down public forums in the vicinity
of the event.
Eighteen states have introduced resolutions calling on
their federal representatives to halt work on the North
American Union (they include Virginia and South Carolina).
Three of these states (Idaho, Montana and Oklahoma) have
passed their resolutions.
This came after it was revealed that the Mayor of Oklahoma
City, with the approval of 90 other officials, signed
a document endorsing an economic and political
integration of the U.S. with Canada and Mexico.
U.S. Congressmen, including NC's
Virginia Foxx and Walter Jones, along with
all three Republican Congressmen running for
President, have signed on as co-sponsors of
HCR40, which calls on the executive branch
to end all work on the North American Union
and the proposed superhighway.
The standardization and centralization of policy into
a North American Union framework is very real, a fact
we personally came face to face with this week after
our office received a letter from the Texas Workforce
Commission demanding that we provide business information
for the purposes of assigning a North American Industry
Classification System (NAICS) code to our location.
Click for enlargements.
website reveals that "The North American
Industry Classification System has replaced the U.S.
Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) system. NAICS
will reshape the way we view our changing economy."
"NAICS was developed jointly by the U.S., Canada,
and Mexico to provide new comparability in statistics
about business activity across North America."
The fact that we received this letter and that businesses
across America are being forced to submit census information
for the purposes of registration in a North American
database that includes Mexico and Canada is no "conspiracy
theory," its another documented step on the road
to full harmonization and integration.
The planned introduction of the Amero, a pan-American
currency lambasted in the Globe piece as another conspiracy
theory, is common knowledge amongst all financial analysts
worth their salt. Steve Previs of Jefferies International
talked about it on a CNBC segment in November last year.
Robert Pastor, one of the architects of
the plan for a regional government, has authored
a book and speaks at confabs in front of
governmental officials, promoting the adoption of the
amero as a common monetary currency to replace the dollar
and the peso.
The latest media attacks come on the back of a recent
Boston Globe piece entitled The
amero conspiracy, the latest in a long line of public
relations stunts on behalf of the establishment to attempt to
hoodwink Americans into thinking that the NAU is crackpot conspiracy
fodder on a par with bigfoot, when in reality a plan for merging
the Americas is on the record and its protagonists have long bragged
about their goal to destroy U.S. sovereignty in pursuit of world
The ultimate goal, to bring together the Pan American Union,
the Asian Union and the European Union into a structure of world
government, is also often scoffed at by the media as another conspiracy
theory, but the agenda to end U.S. sovereignty in the interests
of centralizing global power is a concept that has been pushed
by elitists for decades and their intentions to do so are on the
Here are just a handful of quotes from top power brokers attesting
to that fact, as well as warnings from those who oppose it.
"In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete;
all states will recognize a single, global authority. National
sovereignty wasn't such a great idea after all."
Strobe Talbot, President Clinton's Deputy Secretary of State,
as quoted in Time, July 20th, 1992.
"If instant world government, Charter review, and a greatly
strengthened International Court do not provide the answers,
what hope for progress is there? The answer will not satisfy
those who seek simple solutions to complex problems, but it
comes down essentially to this: The hope for the foreseeable
lies, not in building up a few ambitious central institutions
of universal membership and general jurisdiction as was envisaged
at the end of the last war, but rather in the much more decentralized,
disorderly and pragmatic process of inventing or adapting institutions
of limited jurisdiction and selected membership to deal with
specific problems on a case-by-case basis ... In short, the
'house of world order' will have to be built from the bottom
up rather than f rom the top down. It will look like a great
'booming, buzzing confusion,' to use William James' famous description
of reality, but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding
it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned
Richard N. Gardner, in Foreign Affairs (April 1974)
"Ultimately, our objective is to welcome the Soviet Union
back into the world order. Perhaps the world order of the future
will truly be a family of nations."
President George Bush Texas A&M University 1989
"There does exist and has existed for a generation, an
international . . . network which operates, to some extent,
in the way the radical right believes the Communists act. In
fact, this network, which we may identify as the Round Table
Groups, has no aversion to cooperating with the Communists,
or any other groups and frequently does so. I know of the operations
of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and
was permitted for two years, in the early 1960s, to examine
its papers and secret records. I have no aversion to it or to
most of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close to
it and to many of its instruments. I have objected, both in
the past and recently, to a few of its policies . . . but in
general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to
remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant
enough to be known."
Professor Carroll Quigley, in his book Tragedy and Hope, 1966.
"We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we
need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the
New World Order."
- David Rockefeller
"Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered
Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow they will be grateful!
This is especially true if they were told that there were an
outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that
threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of
the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one
thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this
scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for
the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World
Dr. Henry Kissinger, Bilderberger Conference, Evians, France,
"The Trilateral Commission is intended to be the vehicle
for multinational consolidation of the commercial and banking
interests by seizing control of the political government of
the United States. The Trilateral Commission represents a skillful,
coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four
centers of power political, monetary, intellectual and ecclesiastical.
What the Trilateral Commission intends is to create a worldwide
economic power superior to the political governments of the
nationstates involved. As managers and creators of the system,
they will rule the future."
U.S. Senator Barry Goldwater in his 1979 book: With No Apologies.
Every time the agenda for full political and economic integration
is advanced one step further, whether by treaties, lawfully binding
agreements or rhetoric about what the next step will be, the establishment
media steps in to scoff at such patently observable developments
and label them "conspiracy theories".
This tactic of smearing anyone who attempts to raise the issue
and to categorically deny reality comes directly from those who
are pushing the NAU
The following is another presentation that pits the reality of
the NAU agenda against the continued denial of its existence:
Many of the afore mentioned media hit pieces surmise that the
entire subject of the North American Union is an urban myth that
"feeds on American fear of immigration and globalization",
just as Bush outlines above.
Other media hit pieces against the North American Union "conspiracy"
seem to hinge on the notion that the globalists pushing for it
don't call it a "union" but a "community".
This is akin to when David Rockefeller dismissed the notion that
he was aiding the creation of a global government, instead asserting
only that he believed in "global governance". The media
are basically ninnying about how many angels can dance on the
head of a pin.
Whatever you want to call it - a plan for political, economic
and social integration of the Americas is afoot and it is being
rammed through with little or no say from Congress or the American
However, as the old saying goes, any kind of PR
is good PR. The rapid move toward a North American Union is finally
getting mainstream attention, as witnessed by
the increased effort on behalf of the corporate media to deny
its reality and implement the usual technique of branding it a
myth or baseless conspiracy theory. As the attacks become more
pronounced, the clearer it will become that the move toward a
NAU is a very real prospect.