Over 650 Scientists Challenge Global Warming "Consensus"
Twelve times more than those that put their names to the
Over 650 scientists have put their names to a US Senate Minority
report that challenges the contention of the UN's International
Panel on Climate Change that there is a scientific "consensus"
on the causes of global warming.
Set to be released within the next 24 hours, the
report features contributions from hundreds of prominent researchers,
including current and former IPCC scientists, who are now speaking
out in opposition of the UN's stance on climate change.
The Senate report is an updated version of a 2007
release, with over 250 more names added, highlighting
how widespread dissent continues to grow in the scientific community
to the alleged “consensus” that the modern warming
is primarily man-made and is a crisis.
In comparison, twelve times fewer - just
52 scientists - participated in the much touted IPCC
Summary for Policymakers meeting in April 2007. Climate scientists
allied with the IPCC were recently caught
citing fake data to make the case that global warming
The new Senate report will feature new peer-reviewed
scientific studies and analyses refuting man-made warming fears.
Of course the fact that the establishment likes
to engage in regular mass public deception by claiming the debate
about global warming is over and any
dissent is tantamount to holocaust denial doesn't
bode well for potential media coverage of the report, unlike the
climate conference in Poznan which is being lavished
with endless media attention about the need for a global carbon
tax to save the planet from the evils of plant food (CO2).
The self-proclaimed "consensus" behind
man-made global warming is one enforced by threats, intimidation
and ignorance, as highlighted by media coverage of last year's
UN meeting in Bali, where skeptical
climate scientists were shunned and ignored for daring
to express an opposing viewpoint.
Following the Bali resolution to impose a global
carbon tax, over
one hundred prominent scientists signed a letter
dismissing the move as a futile bureaucratic scheme which would
diminish prosperity and increase human suffering.
Hundreds more skeptical scientists met in Manhattan
last February at the first International
Conference on Climate Change to discuss the side
of the climate change debate that the establishment media prefers
to pretend does not exist.
Did the mainstream media even acknowledge these events? Not at
all, because they challenge the sacred cow that scientists uniformly
agree on man-made global warming.
As we have previously reported, less
than half of all published scientists endorse what
has been dubbed the "consensus view".
However, President-elect Barack Obama yesterday vowed to end
global warming "denial".
(ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW)
The following quotes, listed on the website of the
Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works,
provide a taster of what will be contained in the upcoming Senate
“I am a skeptic…Global warming
has become a new religion.” - Nobel Prize Winner
for Physics, Ivar Giaever.
“Since I am no longer affiliated with any organization
nor receiving any funding, I can speak quite frankly….As
a scientist I remain skeptical.” - Atmospheric Scientist
Dr. Joanne Simpson, the first woman in the world to receive
a PhD in meteorology and formerly of NASA who has authored more
than 190 studies and has been called “among the most preeminent
scientists of the last 100 years.”
Warming fears are the “worst scientific scandal in
the history…When people come to know what the truth is,
they will feel deceived by science and scientists.”
- UN IPCC Japanese Scientist Dr. Kiminori Itoh, an award-winning
PhD environmental physical chemist.
“The IPCC has actually become a closed circuit; it
doesn’t listen to others. It doesn’t have open minds…
I am really amazed that the Nobel Peace Prize has been given
on scientifically incorrect conclusions by people who are not
geologists,” - Indian geologist Dr. Arun D. Ahluwalia
at Punjab University and a board member of the UN-supported
International Year of the Planet.
“The models and forecasts of the UN IPCC "are
incorrect because they only are based on mathematical models
and presented results at scenarios that do not include, for
example, solar activity.” - Victor Manuel Velasco
Herrera, a researcher at the Institute of Geophysics of the
National Autonomous University of Mexico
“It is a blatant lie put forth in the media that
makes it seem there is only a fringe of scientists who don’t
buy into anthropogenic global warming.” - U.S Government
Atmospheric Scientist Stanley B. Goldenberg of the Hurricane
Research Division of NOAA.
“Even doubling or tripling the amount of carbon dioxide
will virtually have little impact, as water vapour and water
condensed on particles as clouds dominate the worldwide scene
and always will.” – . Geoffrey G. Duffy, a
professor in the Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering
of the University of Auckland, NZ.
“After reading [UN IPCC chairman] Pachauri's asinine
comment [comparing skeptics to] Flat Earthers, it's hard to
remain quiet.” - Climate statistician Dr. William
M. Briggs, who specializes in the statistics of forecast evaluation,
serves on the American Meteorological Society's Probability
and Statistics Committee and is an Associate Editor of Monthly
“For how many years must the planet cool before we
begin to understand that the planet is not warming? For how
many years must cooling go on?" - Geologist Dr. David
Gee the chairman of the science committee of the 2008 International
Geological Congress who has authored 130 plus peer reviewed
papers, and is currently at Uppsala University in Sweden.
“Gore prompted me to start delving into the science
again and I quickly found myself solidly in the skeptic camp…Climate
models can at best be useful for explaining climate changes
after the fact.” - Meteorologist Hajo Smit of Holland,
who reversed his belief in man-made warming to become a skeptic,
is a former member of the Dutch UN IPCC committee.
“Many [scientists] are now searching for a way to
back out quietly (from promoting warming fears), without having
their professional careers ruined.” - Atmospheric
physicist James A. Peden, formerly of the Space Research and
Coordination Center in Pittsburgh.
“Creating an ideology pegged to carbon dioxide is
a dangerous nonsense…The present alarm on climate change
is an instrument of social control, a pretext for major businesses
and political battle. It became an ideology, which is concerning.”
- Environmental Scientist Professor Delgado Domingos of
Portugal, the founder of the Numerical Weather Forecast group,
has more than 150 published articles.
“CO2 emissions make absolutely no difference one
way or another….Every scientist knows this, but it doesn’t
pay to say so…Global warming, as a political vehicle,
keeps Europeans in the driver’s seat and developing nations
walking barefoot.” - Dr. Takeda Kunihiko, vice-chancellor
of the Institute of Science and Technology Research at Chubu
University in Japan.
“The [global warming] scaremongering has its justification
in the fact that it is something that generates funds.”
- Award-winning Paleontologist Dr. Eduardo Tonni, of the
Committee for Scientific Research in Buenos Aires and head of
the Paleontology Department at the University of La Plata. #
IPCC Scientists Caught Producing False Data To Push Global Warming
The world has never seen such freezing heat
VIDEO: The Great Global Warming Swindle
Obama Pushes Carbon Tax Proposal That Would Inflict New Great
Arctic Ice Grows 30 Per Cent In a Year
Get Ready For The Obama “Green Brigades”
British Kids Encouraged To Become "Climate Cops"
Record Low Temperatures Hit America
Central Plank Of Global Warming Alarmism Discredited
No Global Warming Since 1998 As Planet Cools Off
Globalists Love Global Warming
Sick And Tired Of Being Lectured By Global Warming Hypocrites
In the 1970's, "Global Cooling" Was The New Threat
The Creeping Fascism of Global Warming Hysteria
Jones LIVE, A Fourth Hour Now Added To The Infowars Radio Show
Click here to get your subscription today!