In a truly astonishing betrayal of public safety (even for
the FDA), the U.S. Food and Drug Administration today revoked
its warning about mercury in fish, saying that eating mercury-contaminated
fish no longer poses any health threat to children, pregnant
women, nursing mothers and infants.
Last week, the FDA declared trace levels of melamine to be
safe in infant formula. A few weeks earlier, it said the plastics
chemical Bisphenol-A was safe for infants to drink. Now it says
children can eat mercury, too. Is there any toxic substance
in the food that the FDA thinks might be dangerous? (Aspartame,
MSG, sodium nitrite and now mercury...)
This FDA decision on mercury in fish has alarmed EPA scientists
who called it "scientifically flawed and inadequate,"
reports the Washington Post. Even better, the Environmental
Working Group (www.EWG.org) issued a letter to the EPA, saying
"It's a commentary on how low FDA has sunk as an agency.
It was once a fierce protector of America's health, and now
it's nothing more than a patsy for polluters."
(ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW)

Is anyone really surprised? The FDA is a drug-pushing, people-betraying,
scientifically illiterate criminal organization that, time and
time again, seeks only to protect the profits of powerful corporations
whose products poison the people. This statement is no longer
a mere opinion. It is an observable fact based on the FDA's
own pattern of behavior and its outlandish decisions that predictably
betray the American public.
The real reason this is happening
You want to know the REAL reason the FDA is easing up on its
warning about mercury in fish? It's because the agency is being
relentlessly pounded over two related issues: Mercury in dental
fillings and mercury preservatives in vaccines. And the FDA
can't keep up its lie about the "safety" of vaccines
and mercury fillings if it has already declared mercury to be
dangerous in fish, right?
To the criminal minds running the FDA, the clever solution
is to revoke the warning about mercury in fish. Thus, the FDA
takes the position that all mercury is safe, and suddenly they're
off the hook on mercury fillings and thimerosal in vaccines.
In other words, the FDA has just aligned itself as a defender
of one of the most neurotoxic substances that's ever been found.
Only a truly corrupt regulator could even attempt to defend
such a position, and only a truly insane individual could argue
that mercury exposure is safe for infants, children and expectant
mothers. Not coincidentally, mercury exposure causes insanity
(look up the historical term "mad as a hatter").
Given that most of the FDA decision makers probably have mercury
fillings in their mouths and mercury molecules lodged in their
brains from getting their vaccine shots, it's no stretch to
consider the possibility that the FDA decision have, in a very
strict medical sense, lost their minds due to mercury exposure.
There's hardly any other way to explain the mad behavior of
FDA officials.
I think it's time we called for an FDA MUTINY and declared
the leaders of that agency to be too incompetent to run it anymore.
These people need to be relieved of command before their hazardous
pronouncements lead to yet more consumers being poisoned or
killed. The FDA scientists, in my opinion, should revolt (in
a non-violent way, of course) against the politically-motivated
decision makers spewing all this "eat more poison"
advice.
Full
article here