As 2009 approaches and 2008 fades away, I have
a few thoughts about our economy. Perhaps you can factor them
into your forecasts of what lies ahead.
The people at the Federal Reserve understand
the mechanics of money creation far better than the central
bankers who created the German hyperinflation. The mistakes
they make will be different than the mistakes of the German
central bankers.
Hyperinflation would destroy the system.
The Fed does not want that to happen.
Despite their intentions, the people at
the Fed can destroy the system. They risk doing that now.
The Fed has a long history of over-staying
its policies. It creates too much money when it is trying
to revive the economy and creates too little when it is
trying to slow it down. The latest example was when Greenspan
gunned up money to get the economy out of the last recession.
The members of the Federal Reserve Board will wait until
they see a variety of prices rising before they worry
about the monetary base being too high.
For quite a long time, Greenspan followed
the price of gold as he conducted monetary policy. He
abandoned that policy in 2001 when the economy went into
recession. The Fed succumbs to political pressures.
(ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW)
Chairman Bernanke is an inflationist. He
does not want another Great Depression, and he is willing
to risk a collapse in the dollar and the system in an
attempt to prevent it. There are some anti-inflationists
on the Federal Reserve Board. They are in the minority.
They may weakly voice some reservations, but they will
go along to get along.
The Fed further weakened the backing of
the dollar in 2008 by replacing Treasury securities with
debts of questionable worth.
The dollar has been devalued against gold
already. The market did this. By various estimates that
relate gold to consumer and other prices, gold should
be around $600. However, it's now $870 or so. The price
of gold is saying that there already has been a large
devaluation, of the order of 50%. Prices in the economy
generally rise after devaluations, although the process
may take 5 years.
The Treasury and members of the government
are less knowledgeable about finance than those in the
Fed. They are also subject to greater political pressure.
The Congress will blithely run big deficits. These will
pressure the Fed to create money by buying the debt issues.
The Fed has already signaled its willingness to buy this
debt and buy all sorts of other debts, like consumer installment
debt and mortgage paper.
The entire method of attempting to revive
an economy by central bank and government manipulations
is flawed. It creates a sick and weak economy based on
undue credit creation and higher and higher debt burdens.
This was done already from 2001 onwards and created the
current economic decline.
The "natural" or unhampered and unmanipulated
economy, operating freely and without government compulsion
and intrusion, proceeds alongside the sick economy. Think
of the Big 3 automakers, Fannie, and Freddie as examples
of sickness; think of banks lending too much money to
both sound and unsound borrowers to buy property.
The natural economy is what always keeps
things going and produces the taxes that support the dollar
and the government. It produces the goods and services
we all want. The sick economy absorbs more resources than
it gives back. It destroys value.
The natural economy gets stunted and suppressed
when government directs resources to the sick economy
through undue credit creation, to subsidies to sick companies,
and to wealth transfers to people who gambled and lost.
The economy is very large. Neither the
Fed nor the government can really control it. The attempt
to do so weakens them and the economy both, which means
it hurts us. Since this crash is so large and there is
so much bad debt, at best the economy will limp along
despite the massive government efforts.
The government and the Fed will be weaker
than ever in terms of revenues and basic balance sheet
health. But these institutions have power, with the blessing
of the American people, and they are using it in large
doses. They can paper over things for a while.
The extremely low yields on Treasuries
are a negative sign. It shows that the economy is not
producing real returns. It is stagnating. The same thing
happened in the 1930s and in the Japanese economy from
1989 onwards.
The best way to have adjusted in 2008 was
not chosen by our officials. That way was bankruptcy and
re-organization in the economy. It would have been painful,
but it would have led to a better-founded, more free,
and healthier natural economy. The governmentFed
way risks a breakdown of the economic and political system
in a host of ways, leading to virtual dictatorship, economic
controls, inflation, and slow growth.
In the past, these government-engineered
revivals have not really worked. Just the opposite, as
is happening now with the economy sinking into depression.
FDR's New Deal didn't work. The Japanese government and
central bank have failed to revive the Japanese economy
since 1989, for almost 20 years. Their stock market (Nikkei
225) is 8,667 now. The peak in 1989 was 38,916. If the
S & P 500 falls by the same percentage, it will fall
from a peak of 1,562.47 to 348. It is now 904. Companies
can’t make profits in these sick economies. Growth grinds
to a halt.
The Japanese short-term government bonds
have yielded near 0 percent for a long time. People borrow
them and sell them short. They invest the proceeds in
other higher-yielding government bonds, driving down their
yields. This makes corporate securities look attractive,
so people buy them. We then get over-investment in long-term
projects that have very low returns.
Public works projects are a loser. They
are low-return projects. The people working construction
make money for awhile, while the rest of us lose. The
actual welfare of all of the people does not improve even
if the GDP holds on or grows a little. Government spending
that is included in GDP doesn’t add to the well-being
of most of us. The actual well-being of people is what
counts, not GDP growth, not how many pyramids we build
in order to keep people "working."
Our sickly economy reflects our politics.
We have a politics of big government control and intervention.
There is no widespread disillusionment yet with this politics.
Social madness, which entails large-scale mal-adaptive
and harmful behavior, is a fact of life. In religious terms,
it is a manifestation of original sin. At times, this looks
like a kind of mass craziness.
Alfred Hitchcock’s Shadow
of a Doubt tells the story of a murderer (Uncle Charlie,
played by Joseph Cotten) who is on the run and visits his
home town. His niece is Young Charlie (played by Teresa Wright).
Her romantic interest is Jack Graham (McDonald Carey). The
screenplay is mainly by Thornton Wilder. The film dates from
1943.
At the very end, Young Charlie ruminates about
Uncle Charlie:
Young Charlie: He thought the world was a
horrible place. He couldn’t have been very happy ever.
Jack: No.
Young Charlie: He didn’t trust people. He
seemed to hate them. He hated the whole world. You know,
he said that people like us had no idea what the world was
really like.
Jack: Well, it’s not quite as bad as that,
but sometimes it needs a lot of watching. It seems to go
crazy every now and then, like your Uncle Charlie.
I wish you all a Merry Christmas and Happy New
Year. Your many e-mails have provided me not only with support
and encouragement but also with many good and stimulating
ideas. You have replaced my seminars with a larger-scale seminar.