|
Copenhagen: Global Population Control Program Suggested
To Stop Climate Change
Communist Chinese delegates cite concept as
key to saving the planet
|
|
|
 The
Chinese government delegation at the Copenhagen climate change
conference has argued that the Communist dictatorship's one
child policy should "serve as a model for integrating population
programs into the framework of climate change adaptation."
Zhao Baige, vice-minister of National Population and Family
Planning Commission of China (NPFPC) population program told
other delegates at the summit that China "has
made a great historic contribution to the well-being of society"
by instituting population control.
"Dealing with climate change is not simply an issue of
CO2 emission reduction but a comprehensive challenge involving
political, economic, social, cultural and ecological issues,
and the population concern fits right into the picture,"
said Zhao.
The Chinese delegate also cited the UN's own 2009 State of
World Population report, which suggests that if the global population
remains at 8 billion by the year 2050 instead of increasing
to just over 9 billion, as projected, "it might result
in 1 billion to 2 billion fewer tons of carbon emissions".
As a result of the family planning policy, China has seen 400
million fewer births, which has resulted in 18 million fewer
tons of CO2 emissions a year, Zhao bragged.
She also suggested that financing family planning is the most
cost effective way of reducing climate change in comparison
to clean technologies and reduced deforestation.
"Some 85 percent of the Chinese women in reproductive
age use contraceptives, the highest rate in the world. This
has been achieved largely through education and improvement
of people's lives," Zhao said.
Not forced
abortions, infanticide
and compulsory
sterilization then? No no no, just good old fashioned
"education" has ensured success for China's one child
policy.
Of course, the fact that somewhere in the region of twenty-five
million men in China are unable to find brides because so many
girls are murdered shortly after birth was somewhat glossed
over by the Chinese delegate:
"I'm not saying that what we have done is 100 percent
right, but I'm sure we are going in the right direction and
now 1.3 billion people have benefited," she said.
The explosion in the illegal sex trade in Asia as a direct
result of the shortage of women is also, presumably, another
benefit, as is the fact that China now has a vastly imbalanced
population in terms of age.
Suggestions that China's population control should be integrated
globally are insipid, patently ludicrous and downright insulting
you may cry. However, not so according to our leaders, who seemingly
adore the prospect.
Forced abortions, mass sterilization and a“Planetary
Regime” with the power of life and death were all core
concepts put forth by John P. Holdren, the man now in control
of science policy in the United States, in his co-authored 1977
book, Ecoscience.
In fact, Holdren's ideas pre-date the inception of China's
one child policy by two years.
In the United Kingdom, top government aides have lauded
China's method of population control, ignoring
the fact that it has been the primary source of the most human
rights abuses of any government policy on the planet.
Two days ago, a national
newspaper in Canada implored the delegates at Copenhagen
to implement a global program of population control in the guise
of the Chinese.
It is no surprise that China's population genocide is being
tolerated at the UN led Copenhagen summit, given that The United
Nations Population Fund directly supports the Communist State's
policy.
In 2002 Secretary of State Colin Powell stated in a letter
to Congress:
"Regrettably, the People's Republic of China has in
place a regime of severe penalties on women who have unapproved
births. This regime plainly operates to coerce pregnant women
to have abortions in order to avoid the penalties and therefore
amounts to a ‘program of coercive abortion.’ Regardless
of the modest size of UNFPA’s budget in China or any
benefits its programs provide, UNFPA's support of, and involvement
in, China's population-planning activities allows the Chinese
government to implement more effectively its program of coercive
abortion.”
Yet The UNPFA seem to think this is a great thing:
"China has had the most successful family planning policy
in the history of mankind in terms of quantity and with that,
China has done mankind a favour," United Nations Population
Fund (UNFPA) representative Sven Burmester said last week. —10/11/99
Agence France-Presse
Under the Reagan Administration legislation sponsored by then-Rep.
Jack Kemp (NY) and then-Sen. Bob Kasten (WI) ensured
funding to the UNPFA was cut off for these very reasons. Yet
is was no surprise when In 1993, the Clinton Administration
dramatically revised the official interpretation of the “Kemp-Kasten
amendment” in order to facilitate U.S. funding of UNFPA,
thus making available $14.5 million.
In May 2003, the House Committee on International Relations
narrowly adopted an an amendment
by Rep. Joseph Crowley (D-NY) revoking the ban
on such participation with the UNPFA. The amendment earmarked
$100 million for UNFPA over the next two years.
All this is being disturbingly tied
in to the climate change debate by hijackers of
the environmental movement who have spuriously associated fears
over global warming with over-population, suggesting that the
solution is to implement
depopulation policies and punishments for those
who flout them.
The connection is an appealing one to advocates of the anthropological
global warming theory because, if you believe humans are to
blame for dangerous alterations in the climate, eventually the
conclusion of less humans = less warming is reached.
However, there is a fundamental flaw in associating climate
change with overpopulation.
Populations in developed countries are declining and only in
third world countries are they expanding dramatically. Industrialization
itself levels out population trends and even despite this world
population models routinely show that the earth's population
will level out at 9 billion in 2050 and slowly decline after
that. "The population of the most developed countries will
remain virtually unchanged at 1.2 billion until 2050,"
states
a United Nations report. The UN's support for depopulation
policies is in direct contradiction to their own findings.
Once a country industrializes there is an average of a 1.6
child rate per household, so the western world population is
actually in decline. That trend has also been witnessed in areas
of Asia like Japan and South Korea. The UN has stated that the
population will peak at 9 billion and then begin declining.
In addition, as highlighted by the Economist recently, global
fertility rates are falling.
Since radical environmentalists are pushing to de-industrialize
the world in the face of the so called carbon threat, this will
reverse the trend that naturally lowers the amount of children
people have. If climate change fanatics are allowed to implement
their policies, global population will continue to increase
and overpopulation may become a real problem – another
example of how the global warming hysterics are actually harming
the long term environment of the earth by preventing overpopulated
countries from developing and naturally lowering their birth
levels.
Even if you play devils advocate and accept that humans do
cause catastrophic warming and there are too many of
us, and if you can skip past the Nazi eugenics connotations
of population control and depopulation policies, those methods
are fundamentally still not a valid solution to the
perceived climate change threat.
The real solution would be to pour funds into increasing the
standards of living of the cripplingly poor third world, allowing
those countries to industrialize, and seeing the population
figures naturally level out.
Instead, the third world has seen a doubling
in food prices owing to climate change policies
such as turning over huge areas of agricultural land to the
growth of biofuels.
In addition, the
leaked Copenhagen text that emerged earlier this
week highlighted the fact that developed nations are planning
to take on less of a burden than anticipated and that more would
be demanded of poorer countries despite the fact that any further
cuts in CO2 emissions will further cripple their flimsy economies
and poverty-stricken people.
The draft agreement would allow people in developed countries
to emit twice as much carbon per head than those in poorer countries,
who have not caused the rise in emissions said to be threatening
our existence on the planet. The revelations have led third
world leaders to accuse the developed world of “climate
colonialism”.
Another
revelation from the summit reveals that under a
plan tabled by Britain, money earmarked for education or health
in poorer countries would be diverted into projects such as
solar panels and wind farms, again diverting much needed aid
away from efforts to increase the standard of living.
Linking environmental policy to depopulation agendas opens
the door to eugenics and it is no surprise that
through that door have come pouring hordes of elitist filth
just begging to be on the front line of the extermination policy.
One example is UK-based public policy group The Optimum Population
Trust (OPT), which has launched
a new initiative urging wealthy members of the
developed world to participate in carbon offsets that fund programs
for curbing the population of developing nations.
In 2007, the group also published
a report announcing that children are 'bad for
planet and 'having large families should be frowned upon as
an environmental misdemeanour in the same way as frequent long-haul
flights, driving a big car and failing to reuse plastic bags.
The same talking point has been re-iterated again
and again by public
policy groups and environmentalists,
as well as the most influential
scientists in the US government.
While you may think ideas of sterilization and depopulation
could never be accepted by the public, those very concepts are
now being embraced
and popularized by some as the way forward for
humanity.
The reality is that the summit in Copenhagen and it's attendees
are providing a platform, and in some cases actively pushing
for a policy enforced by a dictatorship that actively hunts
down mothers who become pregnant with their second
child, abducts them off the street and takes them to government
controlled hospitals where they are drugged and their baby is
killed - all in the name of saving the planet.
Alex Jones' Films Endgame
and Fall Of The Republic address the hijacking
of the environmental movement by elite social Darwinists in
more detail.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alex
Jones LIVE, A Fourth Hour Of Streaming TV Now Added To The Infowars
Radio Show
Click here to get your subscription today!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
INFOWARS:
BECAUSE THERE'S A WAR ON FOR YOUR MIND
|
|
