|
Big Brother: Watching, Listening,
Shouting And Firing X-Rays
Where will the surveillance stop and how do
naked pictures of people stop terrorism?
Documents leaked from the Home Office in London this week have revealed
that the government is looking into using X-ray
technology cameras by concealing them in lamp posts to "trap
terror suspects".
The cameras, currently used in security check points
at airports, can see through clothes and produce a naked image of
anyone within their range.
Security experts have questioned the usefulness of
such a move, as it would be hard to clearly decipher any "suspicious"
objects, and near impossible to act upon any sighting:
"Some guy walks past and his picture is beamed
back to a control room to say that something is under his jacket.
What do you do? Despatch a police car to hunt him down and frisk
him? security expert Bob Ayers, of Chatham House, commented to the
BBC.
"The real question is not whether the technology can see something
under the clothing. It's how you respond to it when the technology
says there's something unusual.
"Do you have police strolling down each street, ready to ask
people what they have under their jacket?"
Leaving aside the possible health risks of firing X-rays, Millimetre
waves or terahertz radiation at people in the street, exactly how
will this prevent "terrorism"?
We previously detailed how such methods have already
been in use at rail stations in London.
"Anything to make us feel safer" whimpers an elderly
lady whilst giving the most naive bootlicking smile you can imagine.
And this is precisely the point, the general public will accept
any level of intrusiveness so long as it gives the IMPRESSION that
they are safer, in reality it doesn't make anyone safer it just
eliminates your liberty.
While some rightly point out the hellishness of this idea, similar
sheep like moronic comments have also been posted on the original
BBC article:
No doubt there will be people who will claim this is an invasion
of civil liberties, I wonder how they would feel the same way
if their plane was hi-jacked?
James Sergeant, Lancing, UK
What does this have to do with hijacking planes? Oh thank goodness
my plane was not hijacked due to Bill Bloggs being photographed
naked, 15 miles away in Trafalgar Square.
This is an excellent product and as a member of the British
army would like to see it put in its proper place: Out on the
front line with the soldiers that are on the ground. As for the
privacy issue, if you have nothing to hide what is the problem?
D Dymond, Barnsley
If you are a simpering jellyfish who accepts Nazi style levels
of police and government intrusion into your daily life what's the
problem? Why did we even bother defeating Hitler?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want to start your own blog or website, get the word out and support
Alex Jones? Infowars.net offers
high-quality webhosting services at very competitive prices, and
most importantly, with
infowars.net, privacy is paramount! We don't sell the names of our
customers to marketing
firms or the government. Click
here for more info.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How many more big brother functions can be gotten
out of a camera? Next they'll be telling us that the cameras are
going to detect terrorists by smell or feel.
We have previously reported how London police and
councils are considering monitoring
our conversations in the street using high-powered
microphones attached to CCTV cameras.
The microphones, which are already in use in the Netherlands, can
pick up "aggressive tones" on the basis of 12 factors,
including decibel level, pitch and the speed at which words are
spoken. They are so advanced that background noise is filtered out,
enabling the camera to focus on specific conversations in public
places.
Step by step our free and open society is being transformed into
one of hi-tech authoritarian panopticon state control.
Once
again this about having total information awareness, the ability
to monitor everyone, anywhere, all the time. It's about getting
used to being controlled and eliminating any backlash towards living
under total surveillance. Note how the primary function of the cameras
is to detect aggression or dissent.
In an even more shocking move we also recently reported that the
cameras may even start
shouting at you in order to publicly humiliate you
and let everyone else around know if you are doing something they
deem to be wrong. "UNMUTUAL, UNMUTUAL". This way you might
be shamed into never stepping out of line in that way again.
Such forms of eavesdropping and monitoring conversations are not
new, they are now simply less covert and more out in the open because
there is an excuse to justify their use.
A government engaging in escalating criminal actions and becoming
more and more secretive should not be watching and tracking us as
if we're all criminals. The same goes for all forms of watching,
listening, shouting, singing, dancing, flying CCTV surveillance.
That's not freedom.
The very matter of fact announcing and the creep of this surveillance
nightmare works on two levels. On the one hand the placement of
the technology allows a literal big brother monitoring system to
function. Secondly the fallout is shaping individual behavior, which
means it doesn't much matter what slips past the surveillance grid,
because people are cowering in fear of speaking out or being active
in any way.
Big brother may not need to watch all the time and that is ultimately
more successful, because control by fiat rather than force is something
that’s far easier to accomplish and far harder to resist.
|
INFOWARS:
BECAUSE THERE'S A WAR ON FOR YOUR MIND
|
Email
