|
Another Foot And Mouth Whitewash Report: Government "Catalogue
Of Errors" Led To Outbreak
Cabinet commissioned inquiry cites incompetence over sabotage,
praises PM
|
|
|
In a report that smacks of damage limitation, a Cabinet Office
commissioned inquiry into the outbreak of foot and mouth disease
from a government laboratory in the UK last Summer has
concluded that incompetence and poor facilities were
to blame for a leak of the virus.
"This virus should never have got out. Everything
was wrong around the Pirbright; the regulatory system was poor,
the risk management was poor," Dr Iain Anderson concluded.
Immediate reports last year found that the leak
originated
from the facility in Pirbright, Surrey, which was
used by both the government's Institute of Animal Health and Merial
Animal Health, a private American vaccine company.
The reports stated that a live virus, which was being used to
develop a vaccine, had probably leaked from faulty pipes and spread
from the site. The leak led to the culling of hundreds of healthy
animals and an export ban on British livestock.
The findings of the government commissioned inquiry into itself
essentially corroborate this story, blaming "poor containment
conditions" and exactly
mirroring two previous inquiries.
Citing a "creeping degradation of standards",
Anderson also advised relaunching and prioritizing the Institute
of Animal Health in response.
Despite this, Anderson, who also led the inquiry
into the much bigger 2001 outbreak, actually praised the government
and the Prime Minister, stating that the response to the outbreak
was swift and efficient.
(Article continues below)
There was, unsurprisingly, no mention in the report
of concerns of sabotage which were prevalent
at the time amongst Investigators.
Neither was there any probe of a reported "international
drill" held at Pirbright Laboratory, involving live virus,
one month before the outbreak.
The concern amongst investigators was that any sabotage
would not have been without motive, given that Merial Animal Health
Limited, providing they remained undetected as having been the
culprits for the outbreak, would have benefited from record purchases
of their vaccine during another mass foot and mouth scare.
Andrew King, a former head of molecular biology
who was brought in by the Institute of Animal Health told
The London Times that biosecurity was so tight that
he felt the outbreak must have been caused deliberately.
He said: “As far as I am concerned the authorities have
failed to find any chink in the armoury of the establishment’s
bio-security. What you are left with is human movement, which
is not a matter for the institute, it’s a police matter.
It’s very, very unlikely that it could be spread by accident.
People do not spread the disease easily.”
Once again, however, we are subjected to another so called "independent"
inquiry that is sparse on detail, reveals nothing new and purely
serves the purpose of sweeping the issue under the rug, sadly
now a commonplace occurrence where the British government is concerned.
For those who doubt the veracity of British government involvement
in a plot to once again eviscerate the livelihoods of farmers
(routinely the biggest power block opposing the Labour government)
in an act of agraterrorism, they should carefully consider what
happened in 2001. The
Sunday Express reported that the foot and mouth virus
was released deliberately out of Porton Down bio-weapons facility
and could have possibly been the source of the outbreak two months
later.
The disease spread like wildfire throughout the country as many
accused the government of not doing nearly enough to contain it
and the spring of 2001 in England was characterized by apocalyptic
images of burning pyres dotted all over the countryside as over
four million animals were slaughtered.
Coupled with reports of the government making inquiries to timber
merchants and sign makers (before closing public footpaths), it
is inconceivable that an animal rights activist, as we are led
to believe, could have penetrated a level 4 bio-weapons facility
that also houses anthrax and ebola and is protected
by armed guards of the Ministry of Defence Police
and the Military Provost Guard Service. The individual who stole
the vial must have had full security clearance to enter the facility.
Why would an animal rights activist release a virus that would
kill four million animals?
Patricia Doyle, PhD also
reported that Foot and Mouth exercises were being
run by the British government immediately before the outbreak
was made public.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WATCH
ALEX JONES' ENDGAME ONLINE NOW in its entirety.
View more High quality trailers at www.endgamethemovie.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
INFOWARS:
BECAUSE THERE'S A WAR ON FOR YOUR MIND
|
|