|
Top Eco-Fascist Calls For End Of Freedom To Fight "Global
Warming"
Population reduction enthusiast says "a
few people with authority" should run the planet
|
|
|
 A
renowned environmentalist, known for his advocacy of population
reduction as a means of offsetting climate change, has called
for "a more authoritative world" where freedom comes
second to tackling what he sees as the devastating effects of
global warming.
Futurist James Lovelock, tells the London
Guardian that he believes "It may be necessary
to put democracy on hold for a while," in order to save
humanity.
"We need a more authoritative world." Lovelock states.
"We’ve become a sort of cheeky, egalitarian world
where everyone can have their say. It’s all very well,
but there are certain circumstances – a war is a typical
example – where you can’t do that." the 90
year old proponent of the Gaia
hypothesis adds.
"You’ve got to have a few people with authority
who you trust who are running it. And they should be very accountable
too, of course."
"But it can’t happen in a modern democracy. This
is one of the problems. What’s the alternative to democracy?
There isn’t one. But even the best democracies agree that
when a major war approaches, democracy must be put on hold for
the time being. I have a feeling that climate change may be
an issue as severe as a war. It may be necessary to put democracy
on hold for a while." Lovelock concludes.
Which "people with authority" could Lovelock have
in mind for this tyrannical takeover in the name of mother Earth?
Certainly not the disgraced UN affiliated climate scientists,
whose involvement in several recent scandals even Lovelock admits
is reprehensible:
"Fudging the data in any way whatsoever is quite literally
a sin against the holy ghost of science. I’m not religious,
but I put it that way because I feel so strongly. It’s
the one thing you do not ever do. You’ve got to have standards."
he states in the interview.
Lovelock also has little faith in renewable energies, carbon
trading or cap and tax schemes, which he previously told
the New Scientist are "verging on a gigantic
scam":
Carbon trading, with its huge government subsidies, is just
what finance and industry wanted. It’s not going to
do a damn thing about climate change, but it’ll make
a lot of money for a lot of people and postpone the moment
of reckoning. I am not against renewable energy, but to spoil
all the decent countryside in the UK with wind farms is driving
me mad. It’s absolutely unnecessary, and it takes 2500
square kilometres to produce a gigawatt – that’s
an awful lot of countryside.
Lovelock repeats this sentiment in his latest interview with
the Guardian, noting:
I don’t know enough about carbon trading, but I suspect
that it is basically a scam. The whole thing is not very sensible.
We have this crazy idea that we are setting an example to
the world. What we’re doing is trying to make money
out of the world by selling them renewable gadgetry and green
ideas. It might be worthy from the national interest, but
it is moonshine if you think what the Chinese and Indians
are doing [in terms of emissions].
So, perhaps Lovelock would point to his friends at The
Optimum Population Trust, a notorious UK-based
public policy group that campaigns for a gradual decline in
the global human population to what it sees as a "sustainable"
level.
Lovelock became
a patron of the thinktank in 2009. In a statement
released by the trust to mark the appointment, Lovelock called
on the environmental movement as a whole to "recognise
the truth and speak out" on the link between rising human
numbers and global warming.
Lovelock said: "Those who fail to see that population
growth and climate change are two sides of the same coin are
either ignorant or hiding from the truth. These two huge environmental
problems are inseparable and to discuss one while ignoring the
other is irrational."
He added: "How can we possibly decrease carbon emissions
and land use while the number of emitters and the space they
occupy remorselessly increases? When will the environmentalists
who claim to be green recognise the truth and speak out?"
So, essentially Dr Lovelock advocates the destruction of freedom
in order that an overriding authoritative global power can oversee
the radical stemming of the planet's human population - nice.
Roger Martin, chair of OPT, said of Lovelock's appointment:
"We desperately need to remember that future population
growth is not a ‘fact’ to be passively accepted
but something over which we have control, and that limiting
it could therefore play a major role in curbing emissions. Tragically,
the green movement has chosen to forget this. With the help
of eminent individuals such as James Lovelock, we will do our
best to remind them."
The OPT also has as patrons controversial primatologist and
environmentalist Jane Goodall, who thinks that caging chimps
and other apes is better for them than letting them live free
in the wild; Professor Aubrey Manning, president of the UK’s
Wildlife Trusts; and Sir Crispin Tickell, the ex-diplomat credited
with the “greening” of former Prime Minister Margaret
Thatcher.
The OPT also boasts as a patron BBC darling wildlife broadcaster
and film-maker Sir David Attenborough, who has called
for a one child policy like that of Communist China to
be implemented in Britain. The proposal is one of the OPT's
main initiatives.
The think tank is also home to Jonathon Porritt, former chair
of the UK Sustainable Development Commission, one of Prime Minister
Gordon Brown’s leading green advisers, who has stated
that Britain's
population must be cut in half from around 60 million
to 30 million if it is to build a sustainable society.
We have exhaustively
exposed the nonsense behind the idea that the Earth's
current population levels are exceeding sustainable levels and
are contributing to devastating climate change, however, Lovelock
and his ilk at the OPT remain in positions of influence.
Lovelock is also an ardent
advocate of geoengineering the planet in the name
of controlling the climate. In 2007 Lovelock proposed laying
vast swathes of pipes under the world's oceans in order to pump
water from the bottom of the seas – rich in nutrients,
but mostly dead – to the top. The idea being that the
action would encourage algae to breed, absorb more carbon and
release more dimethyl sulphide into the atmosphere, a chemical
known to seed sunlight reflecting clouds.
Effectively, Lovelock wants to try and block out the sun, the
source of all life on this planet - nice.
Lovelock is also a member of The
Royal Society of Edinburgh, an organization that
has thrown its full weight behind the global warming movement,
lending its absolute support for legislation aimed at reducing
carbon emissions by 80%, a process that will devastate the global
economy and living standards.
This organization has been even more vehement than national
governments in its advocacy of the man-made cause of global
warming, calling for such drastic CO2 cuts to be made in the
short term, not even by the usual target date of 2050.
"In his most recent book The Vanishing Face of Gaia, Lovelock
concludes that the damage caused by overpopulation, species
decline and carbon emissions is already so great that modern
civilisation is finished." notes James
Delingpole at the London Telegraph.
"Before the end of this century, he argues, rising sea
levels and overheating will have rendered whole swathes of our
planet uninhabitable and such few survivors as there are will
have to make do as best they can." Delingpole adds.
Lovelock, The Royal Society and the OPT may sound like crazy
nutcases, but unfortunately for us, they are extremely influential
within the environmental movement. They are also far from alone
in their thinking.
Mass sterilization, one child policies and a“Planetary
Regime” with the power of life and death were all core
concepts put forth by John P. Holdren, the man now in control
of science policy in the United States, in his co-authored 1977
book, Ecoscience.
Holdren and his colleagues are now at the forefront of efforts
to combat “climate change” through similarly insane
programs focused around geoengineering the planet. As we reported
in April 2009, Holdren
advocates “Large-scale geoengineering projects designed
to cool the Earth,” such as “shooting
pollution particles into the upper atmosphere to reflect the
sun’s rays,” which many have pointed out is already
occurring via the spraying of chemtrails.
Is Holdren another one off mad kook that has somehow wormed
his way into a position of great influence? Not according to
leading
NASA scientist Dr. James Hansen, who fully endorses
Holdren's view that industrial civilization should be destroyed
to save the planet.
The same talking points raised by the OPT and James Lovelock
have been re-iterated again
and again by public
policy groups and environmentalists,
as well as the most influential
scientists in the US government.
While you and I may think the notions of sterilization and
depopulation could never be accepted by the public, those very
concepts are now being embraced
and popularized as the way forward for humanity.
Linking environmental policy to depopulation agendas
opens
the door to eugenics and it is no surprise that
through that door have come pouring hordes of elitist filth
just begging to be on the front line of the extermination policy.
While they peddle their insane proposals, backed by rampant
fearmongering over climate change on behalf of our governments
and the mainstream media, it is we who are charged with saving
the planet and our place on it by exposing their nefarious agenda
of mass depopulation before it is too late.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alex
Jones LIVE, A Fourth Hour Of Streaming TV Now Added To The Infowars
Radio Show
Click here to get your subscription today!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
INFOWARS:
BECAUSE THERE'S A WAR ON FOR YOUR MIND
|
|
