---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let us help you reach a huge audience of potential customers.
Help support the website and take advantage of low advertising
rates. Click
here for more info.
Find out the true story behind government sponsored terror,
7/7, Gladio and 9/11, get
Terror Storm!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Seemingly the censorship has also started to
spread from Digg to Wikipedia which has started locking down
pages related to HD DVD. It is already too late though as
the code number has gone viral on other social network sites
such as You Tube and Reddit.
The point to make here however is why does it
take something as trivial as this for censorship to be noticed?
Digg, along with many other social networking
sites censors everyday. Infowars and Prisonplanet stories
regularly get hundreds, even thousands, of diggs but almost
never appear on the front pages of Digg.com.
Our most hard hitting reports are usually instantly
buried, sometimes only a matter of minutes after they have
been submitted.
Last March a bug in Digg's spy tool gave one
smart Digger the ability to peer into the inner workings of
the community. David LeMieux found a way to highlight which
users were burying stories on Digg, and why.
A cursory search through David
LeMieux' hacked list of Digg buries reveals that many
stories relating to 9/11 have been buried by the same group.
Reports have regularly resurfaced that suggest
Digg may be suffering abuse at the hands of a group of users
that are burying Digg stories they find ideologically unappealing.
Rumours have been flying around the internet
for months that these so called "bury brigades"
could be more than just a group of geeky self appointed censors
and that it may actually be Digg themselves, or even agencies
of the government, that are censoring stories and preventing
the information from going viral on the net.
Digg's bury system has been accused of being
totally undemocratic because it allows a few users to prevent
the many from reading articles and making their own mind up
on the material.
This system is clearly flawed, many Infowars
and Prisonplanet reports have gone on to receive thousands
of diggs and hundreds of comments AFTER they have been buried.
All this has been of little use because once a story is buried
it cannot be brought back and thus cannot hit the front page
of digg.com and be seen by millions of readers who do not
normally visit Prisonplanet and Infowars.
The same is true of many other alternative news
sites.
The DVD Digg 'riot' proves that users CAN take
over and successfully overcome censorship of information should
there be enough of them. The sad thing is that more people
consider being able to copy Meet The Fockers more
important than exposing how a criminal US government was complicit
in the most deadly attack upon the country in history.