What
In The World Are They Spraying? is an investigation
into all aspects of the phenomenon of chemtrails. Over the past
decade and more, long white trails emanating from jet planes
have been seen lingering in the skies all over the planet, often
expanding and merging to form vast swathes of artificial cloud
cover.
These trails are clearly not water vapour contrails,
which evaporate after several minutes. They remain overhead
for long extended periods of time, often culminating in strange
grid like formations. Now they have people asking some serious
questions.
What are these trails, who is spraying them into
our atmosphere and for what purpose?
This film, produced by G. Edward Griffin, Michael
Murphy and Paul Wittenberger sets out to answer those questions
and discovers some disturbing answers.
Research indicates that the trails are part of
a geoengineering program that may already be in its initial
implementation phase.
Scientists at the Carnegie Institution are using
taxpayer money to lay the groundwork for injecting the atmosphere
with materials they believe will artificially cool the planet,
in a bid to stave off what we are told is modern civilization's
greatest threat to date, anthropogenic global warming.
Even if you buy into the as yet unproven theory
that human produced carbon emissions are voluminous enough to
significantly alter the planet's climate, you should still be
extremely wary. Playing God with the atmosphere may have severe
consequences, particularly given that the compounds these scientists
are testing are known to cause debilitating health problems
and could lead to massive droughts and famines.
Based around the madcap method of "injecting
aerosols of sulfate into the stratosphere" to produce
"a global sunshade," researchers at the Carnegie
Institution's Department of Global Ecology have been running
advanced trials on how to distribute artificially added sulfates
to the atmosphere in the name of cooling the planet.
"The Carnegie scientists ran five simulations using a
global climate model with different sulfate aerosol concentrations
depending on latitude. They then used the results from these
simulations in an optimization model to determine what distribution
of sulfates would come closest to achieving specified climate
goals. They then tested these distributions in the global climate
model to assess how well the climate goals were met,"
states
a recent press release about the study.
One of the main authors of the study was Ken Caldeira, the
man who told a conference of fellow warmists earlier this year
that it
would be a good idea to make the emission of CO2 an illegal
act. Presumably, that would include the very process
of breathing since all humans exhale carbon dioxide. That's
right - the man tasked with playing God with the environment
thinks breathing should be criminalized.
"One approach is to insert "scatterers" into
the stratosphere," states the article. "Caldeira
cites an idea to deploy jumbo jets into the upper atmosphere
and deposit clouds of tiny particles there, such as sulphur
dioxide. Dispersing around 1m tonnes of sulphur dioxide per
year across 10m square kilometres of the atmosphere would be
enough to reflect away sufficient amounts of sunlight."
But the Carnegie study is just one recent example of a research
program that has been ongoing for up to 20 years.
Experiments similar to Caldeira's proposal are already
being carried out by U.S. government -backed scientists, such
as those at the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Savannah
River National Laboratory in Aiken, S.C, who
last year began conducting studies which involved
shooting huge amounts of particulate matter, in this case "porous-walled
glass microspheres," into the stratosphere.
The project is closely tied to an idea by Nobel Prize winner
Paul Crutzen, who "proposed sending aircraft 747s to dump
huge quantities of sulfur particles into the far-reaches of
the stratosphere to cool down the atmosphere."
The science of geoengineering through chemtrails is also vehemently
backed by John P. Holdren, the White House science
czar, who in his 1977
book Ecoscience advocated poisoning the water supply
to involuntarily sterilize humans as part of a "planetary
regime" that would control every aspect of our existence.
The fact that such eugenicists are now in control of geoengineering
programs that will have a direct impact on our health is alarming.
Would you let Ted Bundy take your teenage daughter out on a
date? Would you allow Ian Brady and Myra Hindley to baby sit
your children? And yet here we have a gang of elitists who have
publicly stated their intent to use the threat of global warming
and overpopulation as a justification for killing and sterilizing
people, and we're giving them free reign with taxpayer
money to play God with planet Earth? What is wrong with this
picture?
Geoengineering programs have also been promoted
by the Council on Foreign Relations, which is one
of the main steering committees behind the implementation of
global governance.
In a document entitled Geoengineering:
Workshop on Unilateral Planetary Scale Geoengineering,
the CFR proposes different methods of "reflecting sunlight
back into space," which include adding "small reflecting
particles in the upper part of the atmosphere," adding
"more clouds in the lower part of the atmosphere,"
and placing "various kinds of reflecting objects in space
either near the earth or at a stable location between the earth
and the sun."
The proposals in the CFR document match exactly the atmospheric
effects observed in the aftermath of chemtrail spraying.
A recent report
issued by the UK government also calls for the
UN to exclusively regulate world wide geoengineering of the
planet in order to stave off man made global warming.
Discussion of geoengineering technology is often framed as
a future consideration, yet governments are already conducting
such programs at an advanced stage.
The Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Program was created
in 1989 with funding from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
and is sponsored by the DOE's Office of Science and managed
by the Office of Biological and Environmental Research.
The DOE website states that, "The current focus of the
program is aerosol radiative forcing of climate: aerosol
formation and evolution and aerosol properties that affect direct
and indirect influences on climate and climate change."
U.S. government scientists are already bombarding
the skies with the acid-rain causing pollutant sulphur dioxide
in an attempt to fight global warming by "geo-engineering"
the planet, despite the fact that injecting aerosols into the
upper atmosphere carries with it a host of both known and unknown
dangers.
Such programs merely scratch the surface of what is likely
to be a gargantuan and overarching black-budget funded project
to geo-engineer the planet, with little or no care for the unknown
environmental consequences this could engender.
Injecting the atmosphere with sulfate aerosols is a completely
insane, untested and dangerous proposal.
Rutgers University professor Alan Robock has warned that such
experiments "could create disasters," damaging the
ozone layer and potentially altering the stratosphere by eliminating
weather patterns such as the annual Asian monsoon rain season,
which 2 billion people rely upon to water their crops and feed
the population.
The known facts about what happens when the environment is
loaded with sulphur dioxide are bad enough, since the compound
is the main component of acid rain, which
according to the EPA "Causes acidification
of lakes and streams and contributes to the damage of trees
at high elevations (for example, red spruce trees above 2,000
feet) and many sensitive forest soils. In addition, acid rain
accelerates the decay of building materials and paints, including
irreplaceable buildings, statues, and sculptures that are part
of our nation's cultural heritage."
The health effects of bombarding the skies with sulphur dioxide
alone are enough to raise serious questions about whether such
programs should even be allowed to proceed.
The following health effects are linked with exposure to sulphur.
- Neurological effects and behavioral changes
- Disturbance of blood circulation
- Heart damage
- Effects on eyes and eyesight
- Reproductive failure
- Damage to immune systems
- Stomach and gastrointestinal disorder
- Damage to liver and kidney functions
- Hearing defects
- Disturbance of the hormonal metabolism
- Dermatological effects
- Suffocation and lung embolism
According to the LennTech
website, "Laboratory tests with test animals have
indicated that sulfur can cause serious vascular damage in veins
of the brains, the heart and the kidneys. These tests have also
indicated that certain forms of sulfur can cause foetal damage
and congenital effects. Mothers can even carry sulfur poisoning
over to their children through mother milk. Finally, sulfur
can damage the internal enzyme systems of animals."
Fred Singer, president of the Science Environmental Policy
Project and a skeptic of man-made global warming theories, warns
that the consequences of tinkering with the planet's delicate
eco-system could have far-reaching dangers.
"If you do this on a continuous basis, you would depress the
ozone layer and cause all kinds of other problems that people
would rather avoid," said Singer.
Even Greenpeace's chief UK scientist - a staunch advocate of
the man-made global warming explanation - Doug
Parr has slammed attempts to geo-engineer the planet
as "outlandish" and "dangerous".
Stephen Schneider of Stanford University,who recently proposed a bizarre plan to
send spaceships into the upper atmosphere that would be used
to block out the Sun, admits that geo-engineering could cause
"conflicts between nations if geoengineering projects go wrong."
Given all the immediate dangers associated with bombarding
the atmosphere with sulphur dioxide, along with the unknown
dangers of other geo-engineering projects, many people are concerned
that "chemtrails" are a secret component of the same agenda
to alter the Earth's eco-system.
The fact that chemtrails are blocking out the sun, which is
precisely what the geoengineering advocates call for, strongly
indicates that they are an integral part of this dangerous and
wide-reaching program.
This graphic proposes, "Spraying aluminum powder and barium
oxide into high levels of the atmosphere, again delivered by
aircraft, to increase planetary reflectance (albedo) and cloud
cover." High levels of barium have been found in substances
associated with chemtrails.
Reports of chemtrails have increased dramatically over the
last 10 years. Many have speculated that they are part of a
government program to alter climate, inoculate humans against
certain pathogens, or even to toxify humans as part of a population
reduction agenda.
In conducting Google searches, one finds discussion,such
as this example, of using sulphur dioxide as a
jet fuel additive to be dispersed over the world during routine
commercial flights.
"I suggest that both the sulphur dioxide and the silica particles
could be delivered into the stratosphere by dissolving an additive
in jet aviation fuel," writes engineer John Gorman, who has
conducted experiments to test the feasibility of such a scenario.
"We would want to burn fuel containing the additive specifically
when the aircraft was cruising in the lower stratosphere," he
adds.
In 2008, a KSLA
news investigation found that a substance that
fell to earth from a high altitude chemtrail contained high
levels of Barium (6.8 ppm) and Lead (8.2 ppm) as well as trace
amounts of other chemicals including arsenic, chromium, cadmium,
selenium and silver. Of these, all but one are metals, some
are toxic while several are rarely or never found in nature.
The newscast focuses on Barium, which its research shows is
a "hallmark of chemtrails." KSLA found Barium levels in its
samples at 6.8 ppm or "more than six times the toxic level set
by the EPA." The Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality
confirmed that the high levels of Barium were "very unusual,"
but commented that "proving the source was a whole other matter"
in its discussion with KSLA.
KSLA also asked Mark Ryan, Director of the Poison Control Center,
about the effects of Barium on the human body. Ryan commented
that "short term exposure can lead to anything from stomach
to chest pains and that long term exposure causes blood pressure
problems." The Poison Control Center further reported that long-term
exposure, as with any harmful substance, would contribute to
weakening the immune system, which many speculate is the purpose
of such man-made chemical trails.
Indeed, barium oxide has cropped up repeatedly as a contaminant
from suspected geoengineering experimentation.
KSLA also put aerosolized-chemical testing in its historical
context, citing a voluminous number of unclassified tests exposed
in 1977 Senate hearings. The tests included experimenting with
biochemical compounds on the public. KSLA reports that "239
populated areas were contaminated with biological agents between
1949 and 1969."
One of the accepted truisms of scientific study is the fact
that if scientists are proposing an idea, then those scientists
with access to the bottomless pit of black-budget secret government
funding are already doing it.
It is highly likely that chemtrails are merely one manifestation
of "geo-engineering" that is taking place without proper debate,
notification or any form of legality, and with a callous disregard
for the potential dangers to both our health and our environment.
On the face of it, the idea of artificially poisoning the atmosphere
with a substance known to cause massive health problems and
one that many environmentalists say will lead to crippling droughts
and famines, is a complete over-reaction to combating climate
change which has naturally occurred for eons before man ever
set foot on the planet. Add to that the fact that the people
proposing, funding, and researching the issue are all avowed
eugenicists who have been vocal in their mission to enact draconian
measures of population control and the true scope of what we're
dealing with is clear - an effort by control freaks whose
sole interest is not about caring for the planet but hijacking
well-placed concerns about the environment as a vehicle through
which to enforce their putrid cocktail of death and tyranny.
Related Reading: What In The World Are They Spraying?
Part
One, Part
Two - By Michael J. Murphy
——————————————————————
Steve Watson is the London based writer
and editor at Alex Jones' Infowars.net, and regular contributor
to Prisonplanet.com. He has a Masters Degree in International
Relations from the School of Politics at The University of Nottingham
in England.
